Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2002) 124 543-556
DOI: 10.1530/rep.0.1240543
Copyright © 2002 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rief, S
Right arrow Articles by Prelle, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rief, S
Right arrow Articles by Prelle, K

Articles

Effects of a novel co-culture system on development, metabolism and gene expression of bovine embryos produced in vitro

S Rief, F Sinowatz, M Stojkovic, R Einspanier, E Wolf, and K Prelle

An in vitro model using co-culture of bovine in vitro-produced (IVP) embryos and bovine oviduct epithelial cells (bOECs) was established to study embryo-maternal interactions in the oviductal environment. In vitro conditions maintaining differentiated growth of oviductal cells were determined by evaluating several media supplemented with different sera at various concentrations. Morphological features were used as indicators of physiological growth, and it became obvious that synthetic oviduct fluid (SOF) supplemented with either oestrous cow serum (OCS) or dextran-coated charcoal-treated fetal calf serum (DCC-FCS) helped to prevent dedifferentiation of bOECs (Expt 1). RT-real-time-PCR analysis revealed an increased mRNA content of the oviduct-specific glycoprotein GP 85-97 when using lower serum concentrations (2 and 5% compared with 10%; Expt 2). In subsequent experiments in which cell-free cultured controls and co-cultured embryos were compared, co-cultured embryos showed an increased rate of cleavage (P < 0.05) after 3 days. Successive cell-free culture until day 8 resulted in a lower rate of blastocyst development (P < 0.05) and reduced ATP content (P < 0.05) of co-cultured versus control embryos (Expt 3). Long-term co-culture (8 days) in SOF with 5% OCS increased the expression of developmentally relevant genes (glucose transporter 1 (Glut-1) and heat shock protein (HSP 70)) in co-cultured versus control embryos (Expt 4). Higher embryonic Glut-1 mRNA expression after co-culture was obvious when using 10% DCC-FCS, but was not significant when culture medium was supplemented with 10% rather than 5% OCS (Expt 5). In conclusion, SOF with 5% OCS supports differentiated growth of bOECs. Co-culture under these conditions improves early cleavage rate, but not blastocyst development, and increases the expression of developmentally relevant genes influenced by type of serum and serum concentration.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
R. Rottmayer, S. E Ulbrich, S. Kolle, K. Prelle, C. Neumueller, F. Sinowatz, H. H D Meyer, E. Wolf, and S. Hiendleder
A bovine oviduct epithelial cell suspension culture system suitable for studying embryo-maternal interactions: morphological and functional characterization.
Reproduction, October 1, 2006; 132(4): 637 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. Lonergan, D. Rizos, A. Gutierrez-Adan, P.M. Moreira, B. Pintado, J. de la Fuente, and M.P. Boland
Temporal Divergence in the Pattern of Messenger RNA Expression in Bovine Embryos Cultured from the Zygote to Blastocyst Stage In Vitro or In Vivo
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2003; 69(4): 1424 - 1431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. Bauersachs, H. Blum, S. Mallok, H. Wenigerkind, S. Rief, K. Prelle, and E. Wolf
Regulation of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Bovine Oviduct Epithelial Cell Function in the Postovulation Period: A Transcriptomics Approach
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2003; 68(4): 1170 - 1177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2002 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.