Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2002) 123 79-86
DOI: 10.1530/rep.0.1230079
Copyright © 2002 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, L.
Right arrow Articles by Donoghue, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by King, L.
Right arrow Articles by Donoghue, A.

Articles

Segregation of spermatozoa within sperm storage tubules of fowl and turkey hens

LM King, JP Brillard, WM Garrett, MR Bakst, and AM Donoghue

In avian species, spermatozoa reside in the oviduct for prolonged periods in specialized structures known as sperm storage tubules, but little is known about the relative distribution of spermatozoa in these tubules after successive inseminations by different males. The staining efficacies of various fluorescent dyes for fowl and turkey spermatozoa were evaluated to investigate one proposed mechanism of sperm competition. Hens were then inseminated at different intervals with stained and unstained spermatozoa to observe the spatial distribution of spermatozoa within the storage tubules. Several novel fluorescent lipophilic tracers that successfully stain mammalian spermatozoa either did not stain fowl or turkey spermatozoa, or greatly impaired sperm motility. In contrast, Hoechst 33342 readily stained sperm nuclei (fowl: 25 nmol l-1; turkey: 77 nmol l-1) within 4 h without inhibiting sperm motility, or affecting fertility or the hatching ability of the eggs. Hens were tandemly inseminated with equal numbers of stained or unstained spermatozoa at 24 h intervals and were killed 24 h after the final insemination to study sperm entry and storage within the tubules. Oviductal mucosa containing sperm storage tubules was removed, and individual tubules were classified as containing stained spermatozoa, unstained spermatozoa, a mixture of stained and unstained spermatozoa, or as not containing spermatozoa. Results from the present study indicate that spermatozoa from two different inseminations generally segregate into different storage tubules in both fowl and turkey hens. Storage tubules containing mixed populations of spermatozoa were found in only 4% of fowl and 12% of turkey storage tubules examined. Thus, the mechanism of last-male precedence does not appear to be due to the stratification of spermatozoa within the tubules.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
A. G. Denk, A. Holzmann, A. Peters, E. L.M. Vermeirssen, and B. Kempenaers
Paternity in mallards: effects of sperm quality and female sperm selection for inbreeding avoidance
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2005; 16(5): 825 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
E. L. Long, T. S. Sonstegard, J. A. Long, C. P. Van Tassell, and K. A. Zuelke
Serial Analysis of Gene Expression in Turkey Sperm Storage Tubules in the Presence and Absence of Resident Sperm
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2003; 69(2): 469 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2002 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.