Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2002) 123 3-11
DOI: 10.1530/rep.0.1230003
Copyright © 2002 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gosden, R
Right arrow Articles by Nagano, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gosden, R
Right arrow Articles by Nagano, M

Articles

Preservation of fertility in nature and ART

R Gosden and M Nagano

Individuals may regard reproduction as optional but sufficient number of them must be productive to perpetuate the species. The reproductive system is surprisingly vulnerable and depends, among other things, on a limited endowment of oocytes, controlled proliferation of spermatogonial stem cells and the genetic integrity of both. The developmental competence of oocytes and spermatogonial stem cells is maintained by evolved mechanisms for cellular detoxification and genomic stability, and excess or damaged cells are eliminated by apoptosis. Gonadal failure as a result of germ cell depletion can occur at any age, and from the effects of chemical cytotoxicity, disease and infection as well as genetic predisposition. Among extrinsic factors, alkylating agents and ionizing radiation are important causes of iatrogenic gonadal failure in young women and men. In animal models, there is evidence that hormonal manipulation, deletion of genes involved in apoptotic pathways and dietary manipulation can protect against natural and induced germ cell loss, but evidence in humans is absent or unclear. Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) provide an ensemble of strategies for preserving fertility in patients and commercially valuable or endangered species. Semen cryopreservation was the first technology for preserving male fertility, but this cannot serve prepubertal boys, for whom banking of testicular biopsies may provide a future option. In sterilized rodents, cryopreserved spermatogonial stem cells can recolonize seminiferous tubules and reinitiate spermatogenesis, and subcutaneous implantation of intact tubules can generate spermatozoa for fertilization in vitro by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Transplantation of frozen-banked ovarian tissue is well-established for restoring cyclicity and fertility and is currently undergoing clinical evaluation for cancer patients. When restoration of natural fertility is unnecessary or reimplantation is unsafe, it is desirable to culture the germ cells from thawed tissue in vitro until they reach the stage at which they can be fertilized. Low temperature banking of immature germ cells is potentially very versatile, but storage of embryos and, to a lesser extent, mature oocytes is already practised in a number of species, including humans, and is likely to remain a mainstay for fertility preservation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
B. K. Campbell, E. E. Telfer, R. Webb, and D. T. Baird
Evidence of a Role for Follicle-Stimulating Hormone in Controlling the Rate of Preantral Follicle Development in Sheep
Endocrinology, April 1, 2004; 145(4): 1870 - 1879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
F. Sun, I. Betzendahl, Y. Shen, R. Cortvrindt, J. Smitz, and U. Eichenlaub-Ritter
Preantral follicle culture as a novel in vitro assay in reproductive toxicology testing in mammalian oocytes
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2004; 19(1): 13 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. Schlatt, A. Honaramooz, M. Boiani, H. R. Scholer, and I. Dobrinski
Progeny from Sperm Obtained after Ectopic Grafting of Neonatal Mouse Testes
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2003; 68(6): 2331 - 2335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2002 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.