Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (2000) 120 177-186
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.1200177
Copyright © 2000 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Picazo, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lopez Sebastian, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Picazo, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lopez Sebastian, A

Articles

Effects of bromocriptine administration during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle on prolactin and gonadotrophin secretion and follicular dynamics in merino monovular ewes

RA Picazo, A Gonzalez De Bulnes, A Gomez Brunet, A del Campo, B Granados, J Tresguerres, and A Lopez Sebastian

Two experiments using Spanish Merino ewes were conducted to investigate whether the secretion of prolactin during the follicular phase of the sheep oestrous cycle was involved in the patterns of growth and regression of follicle populations. In both experiments, oestrus was synchronized with two cloprostenol injections which were administered 10 days apart. Concurrent with the second injection (time 0), ewes (n = 6 per group) received one of the following treatments every 12 h from time 0 to 72 h: group 1: vehicle injection (control); group 2: 0.6 mg bromocriptine (0.03 mg per kg per day); and group 3: 1.2 mg bromocriptine (0.06 mg per kg per day). In Expt 1, blood samples were collected every 3 h from 0 to 72 h, and also every 20 min from 38 to 54 h to measure prolactin, LH and FSH concentrations. In Expt 2, transrectal ultrasonography was carried out every 12 h from time 0 until oestrus, and blood samples were collected every 4 h to measure prolactin, LH and FSH concentrations. Ovulation rates were determined by laparoscopy on day 4 after oestrus. Bromocriptine markedly decreased prolactin secretion, but did not affect FSH concentrations, the mean time of the LH preovulatory surge or LH concentrations in the preovulatory surge. Both doses of bromocriptine caused a similar decrease in LH pulse frequency before the preovulatory surge. The highest bromocriptine dose led to a reduction (P < 0.01) in the number of 2-3 mm follicles detected in the ovaries at each time point. However, bromocriptine did not modify the total number or the number of newly detected 4-5 mm follicles at each time point, the number of follicles > 5 mm or the ovulation rate. In conclusion, the effects of bromocriptine on gonadotrophin and prolactin secretion and on the follicular dynamics during the follicular phase of the sheep oestrous cycle indicate that prolactin may influence the viability of gonadotrophin-responsive follicles shortly after luteolysis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
R A Picazo, J P Garcia Ruiz, J Santiago Moreno, A Gonzalez de Bulnes, J Munoz, G Silvan, P L Lorenzo, and J C Illera
Cellular localization and changes in expression of prolactin receptor isoforms in sheep ovary throughout the estrous cycle
Reproduction, November 1, 2004; 128(5): 545 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2000 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.