Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1999) 115 15-21
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.1150015
Copyright © 1999 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salfen, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Garverick, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Salfen, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Garverick, H. A.

Effects of the presence of a dominant follicle and exogenous oestradiol on the duration of the luteal phase of the bovine oestrous cycle

B. E. Salfen, J. R. Cresswell, Z. Z. Xu, B. Bao and H. A. Garverick

The presence of a developing dominant follicle may be a factor in the control of the luteolytic cascade mechanism and the number of follicular waves during the bovine oestrous cycle. In this study, ovaries of all animals were examined once a day by transrectal ultrasonography. It was expected that heifers (n = 18) would have two follicular waves if the second wave occurred later than day 10 after oestrus (Expt 1) and that cows (n = 14) would have three waves if the second wave occurred on or before day 10 (Expt 2). The objective of Expt 1 was to determine if absence of a large follicle late in the luteal phase delays luteal regression in heifers that are expected to have two follicular waves. Nine heifers were injected i.v. with 10 ml charcoal-treated bovine follicular fluid three times a day for 4 days, starting on the day after initiation of the second follicular wave, to delay growth of the second wave dominant follicle. Nine heifers were injected with 0.9% NaCI as controls. The duration of the luteal phase (calculated as the number of days that serum progesterone was > 0.5 ng ml–1) was greater (P < 0.01) in the follicular fluid-treated group compared with the controls (18.7 versus 14.1 days). FSH and follicular growth were suppressed during the period of injection of follicular fluid (P < 0.01 and 0.03, respectively). The objective of Expt 2 was to determine the effect of increased oestradiol on the duration of the luteal phase in cows that were expected to have three follicular waves. Seven cows were injected i.m. three times a day for 4 days with 1 ml oestradiol (100 µg ml–1 in corn oil) and seven cows were similarly injected three times a day with 1 ml 0.9% NaCI (control) starting the day after cessation of growth of the second wave dominant follicle. Luteal phase duration was shorter in oestradiol-treated animals than in the controls (14.0 versus 19.0 days; P < 0.04). Serum oestradiol concentrations were higher in the oestradiol-treated group during the period of injection (P < 0.01). In summary, luteolysis was delayed when follicular growth was suppressed with follicular fluid (Expt 1). Exogenous oestradiol administration during the development of uterine oestradiol responsiveness initiated luteolysis earlier compared with control animals (Expt 2).







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1999 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.