Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1998) 112 399-405
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.1120399
Copyright © 1998 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Randall, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Symes, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Randall, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Symes, J.

Photoperiod-induced phase-shifts of the endogenous clock controlling reproduction in the rainbow trout: a circannual phase–response curve

C. F. Randall, N. R. Bromage, J. Duston and J. Symes

Different groups of winter-spawning female rainbow trout that had been maintained under seasonally changing daylength and temperature were exposed to 2 months of continuous light at different times of the year. The same photoperiod produced advances in the time of spawning of up to 232 days and delays of up to 80 days, depending upon the timing of exposure in relation to the phase of the reproductive cycle. The proportion of fish spawning in each group varied from 18% to 100%, again dependent on the timing of exposure to continuous light. The photoperiod-induced changes in spawning time can be interpreted as phase-dependent phase-shifts of an endogenous circannual clock controlling maturation. It is proposed that long days, occurring earlier or later than they would under a natural photoperiod, were perceived as indications that the clock was running slow or fast, thus initiating corrective forward adjustments (advance phase-shifts) or backward adjustments (delay phase-shifts), respectively. Collectively, these responses can be described in the form of a circannual phase–response curve.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
K. S. Last and P. J. W. Olive
Interaction Between Photoperiod and an Endogenous Seasonal Factor in Influencing the Diel Locomotor Activity of the Benthic Polychaete Nereis virens Sars
Biol. Bull., April 1, 2004; 206(2): 103 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. K. Barrell, L. A. Thrun, M. E. Brown, C. Viguié, and F. J. Karsch
Importance of Photoperiodic Signal Quality to Entrainment of the Circannual Reproductive Rhythm of the Ewe
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2000; 63(3): 769 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
S. D. McCormick, S. Moriyama, and B. T. Bjornsson
Low temperature limits photoperiod control of smolting in Atlantic salmon through endocrine mechanisms
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2000; 278(5): R1352 - R1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1998 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.