Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1995) 104 199-206
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.1040199
Copyright © 1995 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Houghton, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by McMillen, I. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Houghton, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by McMillen, I. C.

Response of prolactin to different photoperiods after surgical disconnection of the hypothalamus and pituitary in sheep fetuses

D. C. Houghton, I. R. Young and I. C. McMillen

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of surgical disconnection of the fetal hypothalamus and pituitary on the fetal prolactin response to different photoperiods. Disconnection of the hypothalamus (HPD) or a sham operation was carried out at around day 110 of gestation (term = 145 ± 3 days). Before surgery, pregnant ewes were maintained under a photoperiod of 12 h light:12 h dark. After surgery, ewes carrying HPD fetuses (n = 10) or intact fetuses (n = 13) were exposed to either a long day (16 h light:8 h dark) or a short day (8 h light:16 h dark) regimen until day 143 of gestation. Thyrotrophin-releasing hormone (50 µg) was administered intrafetally at days 130–135 of gestation and chlorpromazine (a dopaminergic antagonist) was administered to all sheep fetuses at days 141–142 of gestation. Mean fetal prolactin concentrations were significantly higher in the long day group (HPD: 37.3 ± 11.3 ng ml–1; intact: 71.0 ± 16.2 ng ml–1) than in the short day group (HPD: 9.0 ± 4.8 ng ml–1; intact: 34.2 ± 16.0 ng ml–1). In the intact group, fetal prolactin concentrations increased significantly between day 6 and day 30 of exposure to either photoperiod. However, in the HPD group, fetal prolactin increased with increasing exposure to the long day photoperiod and decreased with increasing exposure to the short day photoperiod. The peak percentage increases in prolactin after administration of thyrotrophin-releasing hormone were significantly higher in the short day group (HPD: 696 ± 195%; intact: 521 ± 86%) than in the long day group (HPD: 211 ± 13%; intact: 224 ± 26%). There were no differences, however, between the intact and HPD groups in the percentage responses to thyrotrophin releasing hormone in either lighting regimen. In the intact group, the peak increase in prolactin occurred at 20 min after chlorpromazine in the short day group and at 40 min after chlorpromazine in the long day group. In the HPD group, there was no significant change in prolactin after chlorpromazine administration in either lighting regimen. In ewes carrying intact fetuses, maternal prolactin concentrations were significantly higher under the long day regimen than under the short day regimen. In the ewes carrying HPD fetuses, however, there was no consistent difference between maternal prolactin concentrations under either lighting regimen during the entire study period. In summary, we have demonstrated that there is a prolactin response to external photoperiod in sheep fetuses in which the hypothalamic–pituitary axis is either intact or surgically disconnected. The prolactin response is, therefore, unlikely to be entirely mediated by the inhibitory dopaminergic innervation of the pars distalis or median eminence.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
S. Gentili, J. S. Schwartz, M. J. Waters, and I. C. McMillen
Prolactin and the expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 in the sheep adrenal gland before birth
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): R1399 - R1405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
S. Gentili, M. J. Waters, and I. C. McMillen
Differential regulation of suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 in the liver and adipose tissue of the sheep fetus in late gestation
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2006; 290(4): R1044 - R1051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
S Pearce, H Budge, A Mostyn, E Genever, R Webb, P Ingleton, A M Walker, M E Symonds, and T Stephenson
Prolactin, the prolactin receptor and uncoupling protein abundance and function in adipose tissue during development in young sheep
J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 351 - 359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Yasuo, M. Watanabe, A. Tsukada, T. Takagi, M. Iigo, K. Shimada, S. Ebihara, and T. Yoshimura
Photoinducible Phase-Specific Light Induction of Cry1 Gene in the Pars Tuberalis of Japanese Quail
Endocrinology, April 1, 2004; 145(4): 1612 - 1616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. C. Houghton, I. R. Young, and I. C. McMillen
Photoperiodic History and Hypothalamic Control of Prolactin Secretion Before Birth
Endocrinology, April 1, 1997; 138(4): 1506 - 1511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1995 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.