Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (1960) (1960) 1 197-212
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0010197
Copyright © 1960 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DICKMANN, Z.
Right arrow Articles by NOYES, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DICKMANN, Z.
Right arrow Articles by NOYES, R. W.

THE FATE OF OVA TRANSFERRED INTO THE UTERUS OF THE RAT

Z. DICKMANN and R. W. NOYES

Summary.: Previous experiments demonstrated that a particular developmental relationship was critical in determining whether or not rat ova transferred asynchronously into the uteri of recipient rats would survive to term foetuses. The present experiments were designed to determine the fate of transferred ova, particularly at the time of implantation.

Ova that were I day younger than the uterus developed at the usual rate until the 5th day of pregnancy, but then degenerated rapidly and failed to implant. Ova that were 1 day older than the uterus delayed their development and did not implant until the uterus was ready for the implantation interaction. Neither control ova nor ova 1 day older than the uterus could implant on the 4th or 6th days of pregnancy.

It is postulated that in the afternoon of the 5th day of pregnancy, the ovum and the endometrium having independently attained a specific stage of development, the uterine environment suddenly changes, becoming detrimental to younger ova but stimulating to 5-day blastocysts in such a way that they elicit the decidual reaction, become attached to the endometrial epithelium, and begin the process of implantation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. C. Velarde, Y. Geng, R. R. Eason, F. A. Simmen, and R. C.M. Simmen
Null Mutation of Kruppel-Like Factor9/Basic Transcription Element Binding Protein-1 Alters Peri-Implantation Uterine Development in Mice
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2005; 73(3): 472 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. D. Papay and T. G. Kennedy
Characterization of Temporal and Cell-Specific Changes in Transcripts for Prostaglandin E2 Receptors in Pseudopregnant Rat Endometrium
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2000; 62(6): 1515 - 1525.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
G. Benson, H Lim, B. Paria, I Satokata, S. Dey, and R. Maas
Mechanisms of reduced fertility in Hoxa-10 mutant mice: uterine homeosis and loss of maternal Hoxa-10 expression
Development, January 9, 1996; 122(9): 2687 - 2696.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 1960 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.